How I Handle a Piece That Has Gone Cold

A piece that has gone cold is different from a piece that was abandoned. An abandoned piece was given up on — the writer decided, consciously or by default, that the piece was not worth finishing. A piece that has gone cold was set aside with the intention of returning, but has not been returned to, and has accumulated the particular difficulty that comes with distance from work that was once alive and is no longer.

Every writer who works across multiple pieces has pieces that have gone cold. The draft that was started and interrupted by other work. The piece that was nearly finished but stalled at the last section. The essay that had a strong argument but lost its energy somewhere in the middle and was set aside to be fixed later. Later did not come, and now the piece sits in the drafts folder, neither abandoned nor in progress, getting colder.

Continue reading “How I Handle a Piece That Has Gone Cold” →

The Writer Who Finishes Too Quickly

Finishing writing too quickly is a less discussed problem than not finishing at all, but it is a real one. The writer who cannot finish — who circles the piece indefinitely, who holds the draft in permanent revision, who never presses publish — receives a lot of attention in writing advice. The writer who finishes too quickly receives very little, perhaps because finishing looks like productivity and the problems it produces are less visible than the problem of the unfinished piece.

But finishing too quickly has its own costs, and they show up in the work. The piece that was published before it was ready, the argument that needed one more pass to become fully coherent, the essay that arrived at its ending before the thinking had been completed — these are the products of finishing too quickly, and they are recognisable to readers even when they cannot name exactly what is wrong.

Continue reading “The Writer Who Finishes Too Quickly” →

How I Approach Revision

Revising writing is not the same as editing it. The distinction matters because confusing the two leads to a particular kind of failure: a piece that is technically clean — no grammatical errors, no awkward sentences — but still not working. The sentences are correct. The piece is not right.

Editing is the process of making a piece technically correct. Revision is the process of making it true — not factually accurate, necessarily, but true in the sense of being what it set out to be. A revised piece has earned its conclusion. Its argument has been tested and held. Its structure serves the thinking rather than constraining it. These are different achievements from a piece that has been merely edited, and they require different work.

Continue reading “How I Approach Revision” →